Home

 › 

Economy

 › 

Apollo’s Torsten Slok Says the Savings Glut Is Over: “Now We Have a Savings Shortage,” and That’s a Risk for the AI Buildout

A businessman in a dark suit sits at a wooden desk, writing on a document with a black pen. An open silver laptop is to his left. Behind him, a translucent blue digital world map is overlaid with glowing white icons representing business concepts such as data analytics, finance, collaboration, innovation (lightbulb), and document management. A prominent blue circle with the white letters 'AI' is centrally featured on the right side of the image, surrounded by a complex network pattern. The scene has a professional, futuristic, and technologically advanced atmosphere.

Apollo’s Torsten Slok Says the Savings Glut Is Over: “Now We Have a Savings Shortage,” and That’s a Risk for the AI Buildout

Quick Read

  • The era of cheap money that built the last decade's tech boom is gone, and this shift has a name most investors haven't heard yet.
  • Data center construction delays aren't just a logistics problem. They're quietly destroying returns for equity holders in ways the build headlines don't show.
  • The real AI investment question is not whether demand is growing but rather who actually foots the bill, and early signals suggest the answer may surprise bulls.
  • Just released. Our analysts combed the entire stock market and named the ten best stocks to buy right now. The report is free. Enter your email and see if any of your stocks made the cut.

A leading Wall Street chief economist says the cheap money that powered the last decade is gone. Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street on October 23, 2026, Torsten Slok of Apollo Global Management (NYSE:APO | APO Price Prediction) said: “At the moment we have a shortage of capital and we have an abundance of good ideas that we need to invest in, which is the complete opposite of where we were from 2010 to 2020, where we had a savings glut. Now we have a savings shortage.”

A savings glut means the world has more savings looking for a home than it has projects to fund. Lenders compete to put that cash to work and borrowing costs fall, which helped keep rates near historic lows in the 2010s. Slok says the balance has flipped.

U.S. household data points the same way. The personal savings rate fell to 4.4% in the second quarter of 2026, down from 6.9% in the first quarter of 2024, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis figures.

Deficits and Data Centers Are Chasing the Same Dollars

Slok listed the projects that need massive long-duration funding: data centers, infrastructure, the energy transition and renewable energy. Government deficits draw on the same pool of capital. With so many borrowers competing, investors demand more yield for long-duration and riskier assets, and that pushes interest rates and credit spreads higher.

A credit spread is the extra yield a company pays over a comparable Treasury bond. It is the market’s price for default risk. Wider spreads make a data center or power plant more expensive to finance.

The 10-year Treasury yield stood at 5% on October 23, with the 20-year at 5.37% and the 30-year at 5.33%. The 10-year has eased from 5.24% on October 9, but long-term borrowing remains expensive.

Build Times Stretch as Bottlenecks Bite

Capital is one constraint. Time is another. “In some cases, you have to wait up to 20 months before you can build your data center. So even just building data centers is going to take time, which will have negative consequences for the equity holders in data centers,” Slok said.

The segment pointed to shortages of transformers, which step electricity down to usable voltages, and curtainwall, the glass and metal exterior walls of large buildings. Each month of delay ties up capital that earns nothing while financing costs keep accruing.

Others, including HSBC (NYSE:HSBC), see similar strain. This week, Business Insider reported that most AI data centers will never be built, and HSBC’s CEO warned on CNBC that the AI boom won’t make every data center a sound investment.

Who Pays for the Compute Is the Real Question

Compute is the processing power, mostly from AI chips in data centers, that trains and runs AI models. Slok said demand volume is only part of the equation: “It’s not only about the Q, meaning the volume of demand for compute, it’s also the price for that compute.”

In his view, the key question is how willing companies outside the Magnificent Seven, meaning the rest of the S&P 500, are to pay for that computing power. “And the risks are rising that they will not be able to pay as much,” he said.

The segment also identified early signs of weakening in token spending data. Tokens are the small chunks of text that AI models process. Providers bill by the token, so spending on tokens shows directly what customers pay to use AI.

What Investors Should Track Now

Higher rates and wider spreads weigh on long-duration assets, where most of the return comes years from now. Data centers, grid infrastructure and renewable projects all fit that profile.

Demand for AI capacity and the price customers pay are separate variables. Returns depend on whether customers beyond the largest tech platforms pay enough to cover rising build and financing costs. The suppliers feeding that expansion, power, cooling, networking and the rest, are a separate trade from the chipmakers (we profiled seven of them in a free report on the picks-and-shovels side of the AI boom). Signals worth tracking include long-term Treasury yields, corporate credit spreads, data center construction timelines and AI pricing disclosures from cloud and software companies.

A Real Buildout With a Higher Price Tag

Slok sees the AI expansion as real, with a growing list of projects worth funding. Money is no longer free and construction is taking longer, so in his view the return depends on who pays for the compute and how much they pay.

To top